Emergency Rules Now in Effect
Under s. 227.24, Stats., state agencies may promulgate rules without complying with the usual rule-making procedures. Using this special procedure to issue emergency rules, an agency must find that either the preservation of the public peace, health, safety or welfare necessitates its action in bypassing normal rule-making procedures.
Emergency rules are published in the official state newspaper, which is currently the Wisconsin State Journal. Emergency rules are in effect for 150 days and can be extended up to an additional 120 days with no single extension to exceed 60 days.
Occasionally the Legislature grants emergency rule authority to an agency with a longer effective period than 150 days or allows an agency to adopt an emergency rule without requiring a finding of emergency.
Extension of the effective period of an emergency rule is granted at the discretion of the Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules under s. 227.24 (2), Stats.
Notice of all emergency rules which are in effect must be printed in the Wisconsin Administrative Register. This notice will contain a brief description of the emergency rule, the agency finding of emergency or a statement of exemption from a finding of emergency, date of publication, the effective and expiration dates, any extension of the effective period of the emergency rule and information regarding public hearings on the emergency rule.
Copies of emergency rule orders can be obtained from the promulgating agency. The text of current emergency rules can be viewed at www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/code.
Beginning with rules filed with the Legislative Reference Bureau in 2008, the Legislative Reference Bureau will assign a number to each emergency rule filed, for the purpose of internal tracking and reference. The number will be in the following form: EmR0801. The first 2 digits indicate the year of filing and the last 2 digits indicate the chronological order of filing during the year.
Agriculture, Trade & Consumer Protection (2)
1.
Rules adopted revising
Ch. ATCP 10, relating to diseases of fish and farm-raised deer.
Finding of Emergency
(1) The Wisconsin department of agriculture, trade and consumer protection (“DATCP") administers Wisconsin's animal health and disease control programs, including programs to control diseases of fish and farm-raised deer.
Disease Testing of Fish
(2) DATCP regulates fish farms, including fish farms operated by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“DNR"). DATCP also regulates the import, movement and disease testing of fish.
(3) Viral hemorrhagic septicemia (VHS) is a serious disease of fish. VHS was first reported in Wisconsin on May 11, 2007, after the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory confirmed positive samples from freshwater drum (sheepshead) in Little Lake Butte des Mortes (part of the Lake Winnebago system). VHS was subsequently found in Lake Winnebago, and in Lake Michigan near Green Bay and Algoma. The source of VHS in these wild water bodies is not known. VHS has not yet been reported in any Wisconsin fish farms. VHS can be fatal to fish, but is not known to affect human beings.
(4) Current DATCP rules require health certificates for fish and fish eggs (including bait) imported into this state, for fish and fish eggs stocked into waters of the state, and for fish and fish eggs (including bait species) moved between fish farms in this state. Import health certificates must include VHS testing if the import shipment includes salmonids (salmon, trout, etc.) or originates from a state or province where VHS is known to occur. VHS testing is not currently required for fish or fish eggs stocked into waters of the state from Wisconsin sources, for bait fish or eggs originating from Wisconsin sources, for fish or fish eggs moved between fish farms in Wisconsin, or for non-salmonids imported from states where VHS has not yet been found.
(5) Because VHS has now been found in waters of the state, it is necessary to expand current VHS testing requirements. Because of the urgent need to minimize the spread of VHS in this state, it is necessary to adopt VHS testing requirements by emergency rule, pending the adoption of a “permanent" rule.
Disease-Free Herd Certification of
Farm-Raised Deer Herds
(6) DATCP registers farm-raised deer herds in this state. DATCP also regulates the import, movement and disease testing of farm-raised deer. Under current DATCP rules, DATCP may certify a deer herd as brucellosis-free or tuberculosis-free, or both, based on herd test results provided by the deer keeper. Certification is voluntary, but facilitates sale and movement of deer.
(7) Under current rules, a tuberculosis-free herd certification is good for 3 years, but a brucellosis-free herd certification is good for only 2 years. There is no compelling veterinary medical reason for the difference. A rule change (extending the brucellosis-free certification term from 2 to 3 years) is needed to harmonize the certification terms, so that deer farmers can conduct simultaneous tests for both diseases. Simultaneous testing will reduce testing costs and limit stress on tested deer. An emergency rule is needed to avoid some unnecessary costs for deer farmers this year, pending the adoption of permanent rules.
Publication Date:
October 31, 2007
Effective Date:
October 31, 2007
Expiration Date:
March 29, 2008
Hearing Date:
January 14, 2008
Extension Through:
May 31, 2008
Exemption From Finding of Emergency
DATCP has general authority under s.
93.07 (1), Stats., to interpret laws under its jurisdiction. Section
93.48 (1), Stats., specifically requires DATCP to adopt rules for the “buy local" grant program. Section
9103(3i) of
2007 Wisconsin Act 20 (biennial budget act) authorizes DATCP to adopt temporary emergency rules without the normal “finding of emergency," pending the adoption of “permanent" rules. This temporary emergency rule implements the “buy local" grant program on an interim basis, pending the adoption of “permanent" rules.
Publication Date:
February 22, 2008
Effective Date:
February 22, 2008
Expiration Date:
May 1, 2009
Hearing Date:
May 30, 2008
Commerce
Licenses, Certifications, etc., Ch.
Comm 5
Rules adopted revising
Ch. Comm 5, relating to licensing of elevator contractors and installers.
Exemption From Finding of Emergency
Under the nonstatutory provisions of
2005 Wis. Act 456, the Department of Commerce was directed to issue emergency rules that implement provisions of the Act. The Act specifically states: “Notwithstanding section
227.24 (1) (a) and
(3) of the statutes, the department of commerce is not required to provide evidence that promulgating rules under this subsection as emergency rules is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or welfare and is not required to provide a finding of emergency for the rules promulgated under this subsection."
The Act mandates the licensing of elevator contractors and installers. Under the Act no person may engage in the business of installing or servicing conveyances or working on a conveyance unless licensed as of June 1, 2007. These emergency rules are being adopted in order to provide the elevator industry the ability to comply with licensing aspects of the Act and continue working until permanent rules are implemented.
Publication Date:
June 1, 2007
Effective Date:
June 1, 2007
Expiration Date:
See section 7 (2), 2005 Wis.
Act 456
Hearing Date:
June 27, 2007
Commerce
Financial Resources for Businesses and Communities, Chs.
Comm 104-
135emergency_rules EmR0802
EmR0802 - Creating
Ch. Comm 132, relating to implementing a program for certifying applicants and allocating dairy manufacturing facility investment tax credits, and affecting small businesses.
Finding of Emergency
The Department of Commerce finds that an emergency exists and that adoption of the rule included in this order is necessary for the immediate preservation of public welfare.
The facts constituting the emergency are as follows. Under sections
71.07 (3p) (b),
71.28 (3p) (b), and
71.47 (3p) (b) of the Statutes, as created in
2007 Wisconsin Act 20, a taxpayer may claim a dairy manufacturing facility investment credit for dairy manufacturing modernization or expansion during taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006. Sections
71.07 (3p) (a) 3.,
71.28 (3p) (a) 3., and
71.47 (3p) (a) 3. of the Statutes define dairy manufacturing modernization or expansion as “constructing, improving, or acquiring buildings or facilities, or acquiring equipment, for dairy manufacturing . . . if acquired and placed in service in this state during taxable years that begin after December 31, 2006, and before January 1, 2015." Section
71.07 (3p) (c) 2m. a. of the Statutes states that the maximum amount of credits that may be claimed in fiscal year 2007-08 is $600,000.
Section
560.207 of the Statutes, as likewise created in
2007 Wisconsin Act 20, requires the Department to (1) implement a program for certifying taxpayers as eligible for the dairy manufacturing facility investment credit, (2) determine the amount of credits to allocate to those taxpayers, and (3) in consultation with the Department of Revenue, promulgate rules to administer the program. No other provisions are established in the Statutes regarding the specific process for taxpayers to use in applying for the credits, and for the Department of Commerce to use in certifying eligible taxpayers and in allocating the credits.
Because of enactment of
2007 Wisconsin Act 20, a number of entities that may be eligible for the tax credits have contacted the Department with inquiries concerning the process for applying for the credits, for expenditures that have been incurred during taxable years that began after December 31, 2006.
Entities that may be eligible for the tax credits for the 2007-08 fiscal year face near-term time constraints for filing their tax returns with the Department of Revenue. Although the Department of Commerce has begun promulgating the permanent rule that is required by
2007 Act 20, the time periods in chapter 227 of the Statutes for promulgating permanent rules preclude the permanent rule from becoming effective in time to readily accommodate claiming the tax credits for the 2007-08 fiscal year. This emergency rule will enable the Department of Commerce to establish an application, certification, and tax credit allocation process for the entities that need to soon file their tax returns for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
Publication Date:
February 4, 2008
Effective Date:
February 4, 2008
Expiration Date:
July 3, 2008
Hearing Date:
May 14, 2008
Corrections
emergency_rules EmR0812
EmR0812 - Rules adopted revising
s. DOC 332.19, relating to the establishment of a sex offender registration fee to partially offset the costs of monitoring persons who are required to register as sex offenders.
Finding of Emergency
The department of corrections finds that an emergency exists and that rules included in this order are necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, safety and welfare. A statement of the facts constituting the emergency is:
2007 WI Act 20, section
3132, amended s.
301.45 (10), Stats., in three ways which requires an immediate amendment of s.
DOC 332.19.
First, the newly amended s.
301.45 (10), Stats., expands the persons whom the department of corrections may require to pay an annual sex offender registration fee. Previously, the department was limited to assessing the fee only against those persons who were required to register and who were in its custody or under its supervision as a person on probation, parole, or extended supervision. The new law permits the department to require all persons who are required to register as a sex offender to pay an annual fee.
Second, the new law limits the use of the collected sex offender fees to partially offset the costs of monitoring sex offenders. Previously, the department was authorized to use the collected fees to partially offset the costs of monitoring those persons on probation, parole, or extended supervision, regardless of whether they were required to register as sex offenders.
Third, the legislature increased the maximum annual rate from $50 to $100. If the rule is not amended promptly and immediately, the department will not be able to collect the fees which are to be used to offset the costs of monitoring persons who are required to register as sex offenders. This could result in a lessening of supervision due to budget limitations.
The purpose of the emergency rule is to amend the current rule to require all persons who are required to register as sex offenders under s.
301.45 to pay the annual fee which is used to partially offset the costs of monitoring registrants. The emergency rule also increases the annual rate to $100. The permanent rule process has been started. However, the permanent rule process will take approximately nine months to complete. Emergency rules are necessary to respond promptly to the collection of fees while permanent rules are being developed.
Publication Date:
May 15, 2008
Effective Date:
May 15, 2008
Expiration Date:
October 12, 2008
Government Accountability Board
EmR0803 - Repealing
s. Eth 3.01, relating to the filing of all written communications and documents intended for the former Ethics Board; repealing
s. Eth 3.04, relating to transcripts of proceedings before the former Ethics Board; and amending
s. ElBd 10.01, relating to procedures for complaints with the former State Elections Board.
Finding of Emergency
The Government Accountability Board adopts this rule to clarify the complaint procedure applicable to complaints that will be filed with the Board under ethics, lobbying, contract- disclosure and campaign finance law and the separate complaint procedure applicable to complaints filed under elections law and the Help America Vote Act.
The Government Accountability Board finds that an emergency exists in the 2007 change in Wisconsin law that establishes the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board (effective January 10, 2008). Under
2007 Wisconsin Act 1, a statutory procedure or framework for investigation of complaints related to ethics, lobbying, contract disclosure and campaign finance, was established. That framework does not include the necessity of the filing of a complaint. Under the rules of the former Elections Board, Chapter ElBd 10, however, an investigation will not be commenced without the filing of a verified complaint. The Government Accountability Board finds that an emergency exists in the possible confusion that potential complainants may find in attempting to file a complaint with the Government Accountability Board and, as a result of that confusion, those complainants may be dissuaded from filing a complaint over which the Board has jurisdiction, or, because of that confusion, may fail to file that complaint in a timely fashion.
Publication Date:
February 10, 2008
Effective Date:
February 10, 2008
Expiration Date:
July 9, 2008
Hearing Date:
June 2, 2008
Health and Family Services
Management & Technology & Strategic Finance,
Chs.
HFS 1—
EmR0810 - Rule adopted amending
ss. HFS 10.55 (1) and 10.56 (2); and creating
ss. HFS 10.55 (1m) and 10.56 (2m), relating to fair hearings and continuation of benefits pending the outcome of a grievance, Department review, or fair hearing under the family care program.
Finding of Emergency
The Department of Health and Family Services finds that an emergency exists and that the adoption of an emergency rule is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public, health, safety and welfare. The facts constituting the emergency are as follows:
2007 Wisconsin Act 20 eliminates entitlement to non-Medicaid eligibility for Family Care, which could result in some Family Care enrollees being determined ineligible and disenrolled from the program.
In addition, the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has restricted the Family Care benefit for enrollees at the non-nursing home level of care.
Currently, under ss.
HFS 10.55 and
10.56, persons whose services are terminated may request a hearing and continuation of benefits during an appeal. Individuals who appeal the loss of non-Medicaid eligibility or reduction of services as a result of the restriction of the benefit for people eligible at the non-nursing home level of care will lose the appeal because the change in law and federal policy makes it clear that they are no longer entitled to those benefits. In addition, if benefits continued during an appeal, the individual would be responsible for repayment of the cost of continued services. Therefore, the right to appeal is of no real benefit.
HFS 10.56 (2) gives enrollees whose services are reduced or terminated the option to request continuation of services during a fair hearing, grievance, or Department review of the termination or reduction of services. For individuals appealing the loss of non-Medicaid eligibility, or termination or reduction of services as a result of the restriction of the benefit for people eligible at the non-nursing home level of care, continuation of services will be counter-productive to the welfare of the appellant, because the termination and reduction of benefits will have resulted from a change in law. The appellant will lose the appeal and as a result of the loss, be responsible for the cost of the continued services, which may be significant as costs could be in the thousands of dollars.
Under this emergency order, the Department is providing an exception to the right to a fair hearing and continuation of services during a fair hearing, grievance, or Department review when Family Care benefits are reduced or terminated by an act of the federal government or the state legislature and the individual whose benefits have been terminated or reduced does not dispute that he or she falls within the category of persons for whom the benefit was reduced or terminated. The Department has determined that appeals and continuation of benefits under these circumstances would be detrimental to the welfare of approximately 730 individuals and should be prevented.
